Tuesday, August 02, 2016

A good time to start using letter names

Here’s another one I heard in the classroom recently. A teacher was teaching her children the sound /ow/, as in ‘cow’, and a member of the class came up to the whiteboard to write the word. After the child had written the first spelling and said the sound, the teacher told the child to write the sound /ow/, adding that it was the /o/ (as in ‘hot’) /w/ (as in ‘win’) spelling!

This is not a good idea because it is likely to be confusing to young children whose understanding of the code is still burgeoning. You cannot get /ow/ from the sounds /o/ and /w/. What the teacher should have said is, "This," pointing to the [ ow ] spelling, "is /ow/. It's two letters but it's one sound. Say /ow/ as you write it."

So how did this misunderstanding on the teacher's part come about? Well, anyone who knows pretty much anything about Sounds-Write will know that we do not teach letter names to beginning readers. The teacher, being unsure about whether she could use letter names at this point reverted to the above and this isn't the only example I've seen of teachers saying this kind of thing. The question then is: when is it a good time to start using letter names?

Once learners understand that spellings, comprised of one, two, three or four letters, are symbols for sounds, i.e. they know that the spelling system is a code for the sounds in speech, then letter names are an extremely useful short-cut. When a pupil asks how to spell the /ee/ sound in ‘seat’, the teacher no longer has to write the [ ea ] spelling in the pupil’s spelling book/on a whiteboard, they can simply say, “It’s the ‘ee’ ‘ay’ spelling.” Better still is, once having taught different ways of spelling, say, the sound /ee/, you could have an /ee/ poster on the wall of the classroom, which has on it the spellings of /ee/ you’ve already taught in the context of words, such as ‘deep’, ‘steam’, ‘happy’, ‘she’. And when a pupil asks how to spell the /ee/ in 'seat', you can point to the poster and say, “It’s the same one as in ‘steam’.” Again, it encourages children to be analytical and to think about the particular spelling in a particular word that they might not be sure about or that they simply don't know. 

This approach is one that can be used with learners/writers of any age.  Moving the level of difficulty on, suppose you are teaching the topic ‘the Egyptians’ and you are talking about archaeology. If a pupil asks you to spell it, throw it back to them by saying, “What’s the difficult bit in this word for you to spell?’ If the pupil says, “It’s the /ee/ sound,” you simply reply, “It’s the ‘ay’ ‘ee’ spelling.” That’s it! And you could even add it as another example of the different ways of spelling /ee/ to your poster on the wall.

Monday, August 01, 2016

'Curly c' and 'kicking k' or 'This spelling of /k/'?

Very often I hear teachers talking about "curly ‘kuh’" and "kicking ‘kuh" to register the difference between the spellings [ c ] and [ k ], representing the sound /k/.


Why don’t we use this language in Sounds-Write? The answer is simple. If instead we talk about "This kind of /k/,” or “This spelling of /k/” and then model it on a whiteboard or in the air, we are already orienting our learners towards the idea that sounds can be spelled in more than one way. Moreover, this is a concept that we will shortly be using a lot. For example, we shall be introducing different spellings of the sound /ae/, /ee/, etc.


If we teach explicitly that sounds in the English language can be spelled in more than one way (not a difficult concept to understand) when it is very easy to teach, young learners will already be thoroughly familiar with it by the time we have to teach different spellings of /ae/ and /ee/.


So, when a child is writing and wants to know how to spell, say, ‘kit’, we ask them first, “What’s the difficult bit for you in this word?” Invariably, the answer will be “The /k/.” and we then model the spelling and say, “This is the way we spell /k/ in ‘kit’.” The effect of this is two-fold: first, it makes the pupil aware of what is problematical in any specific word and encourages them to be more analytical about their own practice; and, second, it provides the correct spelling. 

The technique can be used for any spelling a pupil is unsure of in any word.

Thanks for the cartoon image go to Fernando. Muchas gracias!